In Re Minter Elec. Co., Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Dissenting Opinion by
Justice FITZGERALD.
The majority concludes relator Minter Electric Company, Inc. has not shown its entitlement to mandamus relief. I respectfully disagree and would grant the petition. Accordingly, I dissent.
As the majority states, the lawsuit below involves a vehicle collision that occurred on December 13, 2004. The petition alleges Jesus Guevara was driving a pick-up truck belonging to his employer, Minter, when he ran into the back of the vehicle being driven by plaintiffs’ decedent, Irvin Matthew Taylor. Because I believe the time line is critical to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.