Buchanan v. Swift
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff has appealed from a judgment dismissing her complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and denying her leave to file an amended complaint.
The facts stated in the complaint and admitted to be true for the purpose of testing their sufficiency are that on October 15, 1935, the parties entered into á written contract, under seal, the material portions of which are:
“Whereas, it is the desire of the parties hereto that provision shall be made, as hereinafter set forth, for the maintenance of the party of the second part…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Hartley v. Red Ball Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Merrill-Ruckgaber Company v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Domeyer v. O'ConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- MacAndrews & Forbes Co. v. Mechanical Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fadden v. Cambridge Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Lámar v. GrangerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Sachs v. Ohio Nat. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- United Packinghouse Workers of America, a Labor Organization Affiliated With a.f.l.-c.i.o. v. Maurer-Neuer, Inc., a Kansas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.