Legal Opinion

Lámar v. Granger

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1951No. Civ. 7726PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

To simplify references which must be made to various parties, the following abbreviations will be used throughout this Opinion:

H. H. Lamar —Taxpayer

Stanley Granger, Collector of Internal Revenue —Collector

Kerotest Manufacturing Company —Kerotest

Henry Valve Company ■ — Henry

W. J. Schoenberger Company ■ — Schoenberger

United States of America —United States

Action is brought by Taxpayer for refund of alleged overpayment of income taxes for the years 1944, 1945 and 1946 in the principal amount of $27,687.57.

Counsel for the party litigants have been most vigorous, searching and…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. United States v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Kronner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Ruge v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1956
  3. Bunting v. McDonnell Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. Rouverol v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  5. Young v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1958

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API