Domeyer v. O'Connell
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
The question involved in this case concerns the distribution of the proceeds of a sale of mortgaged property where such proceeds are not sufficient to pay all notes executed with the mortgage.
Dora and John Wetzel executed- to the First Trust and Savings Bank of Sterling thirty-two promissory notes aggregating $35,000, bearing the same maturity date, and secured them by a mortgage deed to the bank. Neither the notes nor mortgage contained any parity clause as to payment. Prior to their maturity all except $6000 of the notes were sold and assigned by the bank to various assignees who are…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Decatur Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. CrailIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Green v. Ashland Sixty-Third State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Cullum v. ErwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Keyes v. Wood, Grant & Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1849
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Herlihy Mid-Continent Co. v. Sanitary DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Orchards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Wm. J. Lemp Brewing Co. v. Ems Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Mortgage CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Traff v. FabroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.