Legal Opinion

Kreisa v. Stoddard

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1954No. Civ. 8330PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a money judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action to recover the principal, plus interest, due, owing and unpaid on a conditional sales contract.

On October 1, 1945, respondents and appellant entered into a conditional sales agreement by which appellant agreed to buy and respondents agreed to sell a going floral business, together with the good will, fixtures and lease of the premises constituting the place of business thereof. The sale price was fixed at $14,850, to be paid in installments, deferred payments of principal to bear interest at the rate of 5…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. SteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Matteson v. Equitable Mining & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Kier Corp. v. Treasure Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Jeanson v. ZanglCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Puritan Leasing Co. v. AugustCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. CasaulongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. B.K.K. Co. v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc. v. LantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API