Legal Opinion
McCauley v. Makah Indian Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1942No. 9924PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the district court enjoining the appellants, found to be and admitted here to be purporting to act as officers of the State of Washington in enforcement of its fish and game laws, from interfering with appel-lees’ certain fishing rights in the Hoko River, held to belong to and to be secured to the Makah Indian Tribe and its members by treaty of 1859 between the tribe and the United States, 12 Stat. 939.
The complaint seeking injunctive protection of the Indians’ rights under their treaty, contrary to appellants’ contention, is one whose…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ex Parte State of New York, No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Allan Drug Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Makah Indian Tribe v. Schoettler, Director of the Department of FisheriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Bodine Produce Co.District Court, D. Arizona · 1962
- Department of Game v. KautzWashington Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.