Legal Opinion
Doe v. Harris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2011No. 09-17362PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We certify to the California Supreme Court the question set forth in Part II of this order.
All further proceedings in this case are stayed pending receipt of the answer to the certified question. This case is withdrawn from submission until further order of this Court. The parties shall notify the Clerk of this Court within three days after the court accepts or rejects certification, and again within three days if the court renders an opinion. The panel retains jurisdiction over further proceedings.
I
Pursuant to Rule 8.548 of the California Rules of Court, a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Brian A. Buckley v. C.A. Terhune, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Doe v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine MastoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Candace Fox v. Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.