Legal Opinion

Brian A. Buckley v. C.A. Terhune, Director of the California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 2006No. 03-55045PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge.

The law regarding plea agreements entered into in state court is well-established. They must be construed in accordance with state law. In California, plea agreements are construed in the same manner as all other contracts. In this case, however, the California courts failed to do so and, as a result, Brian Buckley might have remained in prison for life instead of for the fifteen years for which he bargained. We are required to ensure that his constitutional rights are not so violated, and that the bargain he entered into with the state is honored.

*691The state appeals…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Frantz v. HazeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Kernan v. CueroSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine MastoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Smith v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API