Legal Opinion
The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine Masto
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 10, 2012No. 08-17471, 09-16008PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
The State of Nevada appeals the district court’s permanent injunction prohibiting the retroactive application of two Nevada laws: Assembly Bill 579, expanding the scope of sex offender registration and notification requirements, and Senate Bill 471, imposing, inter alia, residency and movement restrictions on certain sex offenders. The district court permanently enjoined retroactive application of both bills on the grounds that they violated the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution, the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution, the Double…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- Tobin Mueller v. Rick RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- State v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- John Doe v. Gary SettleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.