Legal Opinion

Fowler v. City of Seminole

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 20, 1945No. 32263PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

W. L. Fowler commenced an action against the city of Seminole for damages and certain other relief involving alleged franchise rights; plaintiff obtained from W. H. Caffey. The original petition was amended, whereupon the defendant filed a demurrer thereto.

The trial court sustained the demurrer to certain paragraphs of the petition, but overruled it as to the remaining allegations. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the order entered by the trial court is not a final order, and therefore no appeal can be taken therefrom prior to a determination of the rights of the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wesley v. DiamondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Attaway v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Waldock v. State Ex Rel. FinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eason Oil Co. v. Howard Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. LaVelle v. Fair Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Copeland v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  4. Fowler v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Riise v. RiiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API