Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Anderson

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 18, 1985No. 61067PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHTMIRE, Presiding Judge.

Does civil liability for the tort of perjury exist in this state? This is the foremost question which arises from the sustention of a demurrer to plaintiffs cause of action for perjury and pretrial deceit. A procedural problem concerning our jurisdiction to review will be preliminarily disposed of sua sponte. We hold that civil liability for the tort of perjury does lie in this state but that plaintiff has not factually pleaded the essential elements of such a cause of action.

I

The parties were divorced October 19, 1981. The decree awarded Linda A. Anderson, now…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. W. G. Platts, Inc. v. PlattsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Max T. Morgan v. Walter R. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Ginsburg v. HalpernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Doyle v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Cooper v. Parker-HugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Doyle v. Oklahoma Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API