Legal Opinion

Riise v. Riise

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1958No. 38028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, instituted this action as one for separate maintenance. Judgment for divorce was entered upon defendant in error’s cross-petition. Thereafter, but within the term, plaintiff in error filed a pleading denominated a Petition to Vacate. This pleading was divided into two parts. The first subdivision was an application, noting the court’s discretion “ * * * for the purpose of achieving right, equity and justice between the parties hereto and to thus promote and protect the welfare of the children to this marriage * * *”, to vacate, alter or modify its decree…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Attaway v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Morgan v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Dennis v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Tulsa Exchange Co. v. KiesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Fowler v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DLB Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Johnson v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API