Riise v. Riise
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, instituted this action as one for separate maintenance. Judgment for divorce was entered upon defendant in error’s cross-petition. Thereafter, but within the term, plaintiff in error filed a pleading denominated a Petition to Vacate. This pleading was divided into two parts. The first subdivision was an application, noting the court’s discretion “ * * * for the purpose of achieving right, equity and justice between the parties hereto and to thus promote and protect the welfare of the children to this marriage * * *”, to vacate, alter or modify its decree…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Attaway v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Morgan v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Dennis v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Tulsa Exchange Co. v. KiesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Fowler v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DLB Energy Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Johnson v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997