Legal Opinion
Mathirampuzha v. Potter
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 7, 2005No. CIV. 3:04CV841JBAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE [DOC. #20]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph Mathirampuzha filed this employment discrimination action against the United States Postal Service (“USPS”), Postmaster General John Potter, and USPS supervisor Ron Sacco. See Am. Compl. [Doc. # 17] at ¶¶ 4-6. The two-count amended complaint alleges violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (“CFEPA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. § 46a-60. Now before the Court is defendants’ motion…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mathirampuzha v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Oakstone v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2005
- Ford v. DonleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Davis v. CartyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Krul v. DeJoyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.