People v. Duckett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Appellant Otis Duckett was convicted by a jury of first degree murder; the jury also found that he was sane when he committed the offense. He contends: (1) the jury’s finding of sanity is unsupported by substantial evidence; (2) the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct during the sanity phase of the trial; and (3) the trial court erred when it refused to instruct with CALJIC Nos. 3.35 and 8.78 during the guilt phase of his trial. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse and remand the judgment finding appellant sane but, in all other respects, affirm.
I
In 1974,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. HaskettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. MEJIA-LENARESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. RomoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. GatlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.