Legal Opinion

People v. Adolfo M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1990No. D011636PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, J.

Adolfo M. appeals a juvenile court judgment, specifically challenging the dispositional order by arguing the temporary judge improperly found Adolfo to be a legal resident of Tijuana, Mexico, ordered his transfer to Mexican juvenile authorities and prohibited his return to the United States without proper documentation and written permission from the juvenile court. As we shall explain, we conclude the juvenile court properly found him to be a nonresident alien and, in any event, his failure to challenge the contents of the probation officer’s social study renders this issue…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. De Canas v. BicaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Toll v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Raul Gonzales v. The City of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. People v. MontalvoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Jose C.California Supreme Court · 2009
  2. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Y.M.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. State v. VerdugoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. People v. LAUFASACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Opinion No. (1997), California Attorney General Reports1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API