Legal Opinion

Toll v. Moreno

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 28, 1982No. 80-2178PublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The state-operated University of Maryland grants preferential treatment for purposes of tuition and fees to students with “in-state” status. Although citizens and immigrant aliens may obtain in-state status upon a showing of domicile within the State, nonimmigrant aliens, even if domiciled, are not eligible for such status. The question in this case is whether the University’s in-state policy is invalid under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, insofar as the policy categorically denies in-state status to domiciled nonimmigrant aliens who hold G-4 visas.

I

The factual and procedural…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Chickasaw NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Parella v. Retirement Board of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Ohio v. Madeline Marie Nursing HomesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API