Legal Opinion

State v. McMichael

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 23, 2005No. A05A1104PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

Defendants/appellees Vernon Lashun McMichael and Kevin Tremayne Rogers were indicted 1 after drug and weapon evidence was discovered during searches following a routine traffic stop. The trial court granted appellees’ separate pre-trial motions to suppress the evidence, from which the State appeals. In its decision, the trial court concluded that the searches were not conducted pursuant to voluntary consent and were illegal. We disagree and reverse.

‘When reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, we must adopt the trial court’s findings of fact unless those…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. Sommese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. State v. AustinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Cuaresma v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API