Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 2011No. A11A0601PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dillard, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s grant of Robert John Austin’s motion to suppress statements made and evidence obtained at his home after officers responded to a call that shots had been fired there. The State contends that the trial court erred in granting the motion after finding that Austin had not been read his Miranda rights. For the reasons noted infra, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

The record shows that Cobb County police officers received a call that shots had been fired in a residential area on the afternoon in question. The call, made by a neighbor,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. State v. JourdanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. State v. AndradeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. The State v. DepolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. The State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API