Conley v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The appellants, Indianhead and Industrial Commission, and the intervenor-respondent, Petroleum, all contend the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed and that the order of the Industrial Commission should be affirmed. Conley contends that the judgment of the circuit court should be affirmed so as to remand the matter to the commission for further hearing to determine whether Petroleum or Indianhead or both are liable to Conley for permanent partial disability.
The principal issues before the court are:
1. Did the commission, by its interlocutory order in 1960, reserve jurisdiction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Van Valin v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Johnston v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Lewellyn v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Kress Packing Co. v. KottwitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Bukovic v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n, CPF, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.