Legal Opinion

Endicott Johnson Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 1, 1979No. C.D. 4787; Court No. 75-7-01897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

In this case the court is called upon to determine the proper tariff classification of certain cotton canvas shoe uppers that were exported from Japan in 1972 and entered at the port of New York during the same year. Upon entry, the merchandise, described on the invoices as “Canvas Shoe Uppers,” was classified by the government under item 380.00 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as “* * * other men’s or boys’ wearing apparel, ornamented: Of cotton” and assessed with duty at the rate of 35 percent ad valorem.

At trial, defendant abandoned its classification under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. United States v. Mutual China Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. Blairmoor Knitwear Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Baylis Bros. Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. The Baylis Brothers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Endicott Johnson Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API