Legal Opinion

Allmond v. Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 11, 2016No. 34/15PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDONALD, J.

The State mental health law allows for the involuntary medication of an individual committed to a mental health facility if certain procedures are followed and if a clinical review panel — three health care professionals, none of whom is the treating psychiatrist — finds that certain statutory criteria are satisfied and authorizes the involuntary medication. Such an authorization remains valid for 90 days, after which a panel must review again the relevant criteria to authorize continued medication.

The criteria for authorizing involuntary medication are set forth in Maryland Code,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Olmstead v. L.C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Powell v. Md. Dep't of HealthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Mercer v. Thomas B. Finan CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. United Parcel Service v. StrothersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Becker v. Falls Road Comm. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API