Legal Opinion

United Parcel Service v. Strothers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 1, 2022No. 9/22PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

United Parcel Service, et al. v. David Strothers, No. 9, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Eaves, J. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT — WORKERS’ COMPENSATION The Court of Appeals held that the phrase “definite proof,” as used in § 9-504(a)(1) of the Labor and Employment Article, refers to the quality of evidence required by a workers’ compensation claimant’s burden of production for an accidental hernia and does not elevate the claimant’s burden of persuasion to clear and convincing evidence. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT — WORKERS’ COMPENSATION The Court of Appeals held that Respondent’s submitted medical opinion…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. United States v. Bryan K. KalunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Woodlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. Doctor's Weight Loss Ctrs. v. BlackstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  3. Ledford v. Jenway ContractingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  4. Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG60, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
  5. Woodlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API