United Parcel Service v. Strothers
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
United Parcel Service, et al. v. David Strothers, No. 9, September Term, 2022. Opinion by Eaves, J. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT — WORKERS’ COMPENSATION The Court of Appeals held that the phrase “definite proof,” as used in § 9-504(a)(1) of the Labor and Employment Article, refers to the quality of evidence required by a workers’ compensation claimant’s burden of production for an accidental hernia and does not elevate the claimant’s burden of persuasion to clear and convincing evidence. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT — WORKERS’ COMPENSATION The Court of Appeals held that Respondent’s submitted medical opinion…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Plank v. CherneskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- United States v. Bryan K. KalunaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Woodlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Doctor's Weight Loss Ctrs. v. BlackstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Ledford v. Jenway ContractingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
- Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG60, Maryland Attorney General Reports2025
- Woodlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.