Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Thomas B. Finan Center

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 17, 2021No. 9/21PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jason Mercer v. Thomas B. Finan Center, No. 9, September Term, 2021 FORCED MEDICATION – RIGHT TO COUNSEL UPON REQUEST – WAIVER OF RIGHT – Court of Appeals held that Md. Code. Ann., Health-Gen. (1982, 2019 Repl. Vol.) § 10-708(i) conferred right to counsel upon request, in light of plain language and legislative history of statute. Court of Appeals concluded that where form used to request administrative hearing contained no notice of consequences of declining to request counsel, and where individual received subsequent notice informing individual of right to request assistance of lawyer,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KrikstanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. Thornton Mellon v. A. Dennis Exempt TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Emergency Remedy of Bd. of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  4. Clarke v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. Emergency Remedy of Bd. of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API