Legal Opinion

Ribelin v. Peugh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1890No. 14,558PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— On the 25th day of May, 1886, Joseph Jamison owned the real estate which is here the subject of controversy. . At that time, and continuously since that time, Margaret Jamison was, and has been, his wife. On the day named John B. Reyman and Spencer B. Peugh each obtained a judgment against Joseph Jamison, and on the judgment of Reyman an execution was issued and levied on the undivided two-thirds of the land. Sale was made on that execution, and appellant bought the property. A certificate was executed to him in due form by the sheriff. After the execution on the Reyman judgment was issued…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shirk v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Taylor v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hutchinson v. LemckeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wright v. TichenorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Old National Bank v. FindleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Lytton v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Higgins v. OrmsbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API