Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Stockwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Prom the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

"Worden, J.

Action to recover land. The following were the material facts in the cause :

In February, 1874, Alfred E. Taylor, who was and is the husband of the appellant, owned the land in dispute, which' was worth less than twenty thousand dollars. At that date he, with others, executed a promissory note to the Howe Machine Company, for $380.00. Afterward, in September, 1875, the payee of the nóte recovered a judgment thereon against the makers, in the Bartholomew Cii-cuit Court. An execution was duly issued upon the judgment, by virtpe of which the land in controversy was levied upon and sold…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bronson v. KinzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  4. Jackson v. LamphireSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Noel v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Currier v. ElliotIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Lawson v. DeBoltIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bryson v. McCrearyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Davis v. RupeIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API