Legal Opinion
In re the Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Budd G. Goodman, J.
By notice of motion dated July 16, 1993, the Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan of the City of New York (hereinafter referred to as the Director) has again requested this court to reconsider, pursuant to Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) § 127.2 (b) through (c), its May 12, 1993 determination pursuant to County Law § 722-c of "reasonable compensation” for Hillel Bodek, M.S.W., C.S.W., in People v Toe and People v Hoe, indictments 5615/89 and 2643/91, respectively.1
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
On May 12, 1993, Mr. Bodek submitted to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Balogh v. H.R.B. Caterers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Werfel v. AgrestaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Montgomery v. MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Byrnes v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BrismanNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- Director of the Assigned Counsel Plan v. TownsendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. LouisNew York Supreme Court · 1994