Legal Opinion

The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Richter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1936No. 24837PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Did the Court of Common Pleas in the instant case possess the power to enter final judgment after verdict and upon motion for a new trial?

In attempting to answer this rather perplexing question we may not claim the assistance of amended Section 11601, General Code (116 Ohio Laws, 413, effective September 2, 1935), which gives a Common Pleas Court authority to render judgment in favor of the party who, upon the pleadings or evidence, is entitled thereto by law, even though a verdict has been found against such party, and irrespective of whether motion for a directed verdict was made or…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. W. S. Forbes & Co. v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Dougherty v. . SaltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Barnes v. NoelTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. NeilArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. J. & F. Harig Co. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Edelstein v. KidwellOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State Ex Rel. Squire v. SteckOhio Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API