State Ex Rel. Squire v. Steck
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Zimmerman, J.. As we view the matter, the only question now properly before this court is whether the statutes of Ohio sufficiently empower the Superintendent of Banks in charge of the liquidation of a partnership bank to maintain this character of action against the partner-owners of su'ch an association.
It is conceded by the appellees that the superintendent had ample authority in 1982 to take over a partnership bank in failing circumstances for liquidation by virtue of Sections 710-2 and 710-89, General 0ode, as then in force. However, they insist that the scope of his activities in such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. BookWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Watterson v. MastersonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. RichterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Bierma v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. StormsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Czech Catholic Union v. East End Bldg. & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Czech Catholic Union v. East End Bldg. & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- National City Bank v. Guardian Trust Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1938