Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Squire v. Steck

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1937No. 26066PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Zimmerman, J.. As we view the matter, the only question now properly before this court is whether the statutes of Ohio sufficiently empower the Superintendent of Banks in charge of the liquidation of a partnership bank to maintain this character of action against the partner-owners of su'ch an association.

It is conceded by the appellees that the superintendent had ample authority in 1982 to take over a partnership bank in failing circumstances for liquidation by virtue of Sections 710-2 and 710-89, General 0ode, as then in force. However, they insist that the scope of his activities in such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BookWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Watterson v. MastersonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. The Wheeling Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. RichterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bierma v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. StormsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Czech Catholic Union v. East End Bldg. & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Czech Catholic Union v. East End Bldg. & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. National City Bank v. Guardian Trust Co.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API