Legal Opinion

People v. Betances

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: The evidence was insufficient to support defendant’s conviction of possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. A person is guilty of that charge

"when he knowingly and unlawfully possesses:
"1. a narcotic drug with intent to sell it” (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]).

The evidence against defendant on this charge was wholly circumstantial. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428; People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), we must determine whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. BenzingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. KnightnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. People v. OrtaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. HarveyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API