Legal Opinion
Charles C. Delaney III v. James Matesanz
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 9, 2001No. 99-1972PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-appellant Charles C. Delaney III, a Massachusetts state prisoner, sought a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, but voluntarily withdrew his application when the Commonwealth pointed out that it contained unexhausted claims. After pursuing all available state remedies, the petitioner returned to federal court. At that juncture, the court dismissed his new application as untimely under the one-year limitation period enacted as part of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), Pub.L. No.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Kenneth Bernard Rouse v. R.C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Francisco Moreno Sosa, A/K/A Franco HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Drew v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Neverson v. FarquharsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Abraham v. Woods Hole Oceanographic InstituteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.