United States v. Yee Yet
District Court, D. New Jersey
Actions by the United States of America against Yee Yet and another, and against Yee Kee Guey and another. On demurrers to amended declarations.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District judge.
[1] The amended declarations in the above cases, which,have been demurred to, are in all respects alike, except as to the name of the first or principal defendant, and the dates of the orders of deportation. The suits were instituted on bail bonds given by the respective* defendants in the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. The declarations are complete in their recitals and allegations, and are not claimed to be defective in form. Briefly stated and treating them together, they show that the principal defendants in each case, being…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- In re Ah TaiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1903
- Gee Cue Beng v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- In re Lum PoyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States ex rel. Carapa v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- In Re GannonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1928
- Principe v. AultDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.