Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1904No. 16, OriginalPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

194 U.S. 194 (1904)

THE UNITED STATES, PETITIONER.

No. 16. Original.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted April 18, 1904

Decided May 2, 1904.

Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. Assistant Attorney General McReynolds for the United States.

No appearance or brief filed for respondents.

2Opinion of the Court · FullerChief Justice Fuller

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus, commanding the judge of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio to direct the entry on the records of that court of final judgment in the cases of The United States v. Jock Coe, Bong Meng, and Woo Joe, and that the clerk enter the same; and…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chin Bak Kan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. Mrs. Gue LimSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Tom Hong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Ah How v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Porter Ads. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ng Fung Ho v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Collins v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Craig v. HechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  5. Paolo Lo Duca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API