Legal Opinion
In re Ah Tai
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 16, 1903PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
A Chinaman was complained of under the Chinese exclusion acts of May 5, 1892, c. 60, 27 Stat. 25 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1319], and November 3, 1893, c. 14, 28 Stat. 7 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1322], as being a Chinese, laborer in the United States without authority. After hearing, the commissioner *796ordered his deportation. He has duly appealed to me, and, pending a hearing on his appeal, asks to be admitted to bail. The district attorney has opposed his petition, and has objected that he cannot be bailed under the circumstances.
The bailing of a Chinaman under the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Wright v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hudson v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Mrs. Gue LimSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Li Sing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Mapp v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Potash v. District Director of Immigration & NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- United States ex rel. Carapa v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- In re YuenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.