Legal Opinion
In Re Barceloux
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1934No. 7329PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
74 F.2d 288 (1934)
In re BARCELOUX.
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.
v.
BUFFUM et al.
No. 7329.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 3, 1934.
Rehearing Denied January 7, 1935.
John Ralph Wilson and Milton Newmark, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Devlin & Devlin, of Sacramento, Cal., for appellee Buffum.
Horace B. Wulff, of Sacramento, Cal., for appellee Devlin & Devlin.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
In this case now on appeal to this court, the appellees appeared generally and filed briefs discussing the case upon the merits, and the matter…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Buffum v. Peter Barceloux Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- In Re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Watkins v. SedberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- In re De RanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Pac. Far East Line, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- In The Matter Of Midwest Engineering And Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- In re Barry Yao Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1959
- In Re Meade Land and Development Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- In re Barry Yao Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.