Legal Opinion
In re Barry Yao Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 31, 1959No. 63410PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
These bankruptcy proceedings are now before the Court upon a petition for review of an order by the Referee in Bankruptcy allowing attorneys’ fees to special counsel for the receiver and to the attorney for the creditors.
Proceedings were originally commenced in August of 1954 by the filing of an involuntary petition under § 18, sub.. a of the Act [11 U.S.C.A. § 41, sub. a] against (1) Barry Yao Company, a co-partnership, consisting of Lottie Barry, Bill Barry (Lottie’s husband), and Jimmy Yao, copartners; and (2) Lottie Barry, Bill Barry, and Jimmy Yao, individually.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Puerto Rico v. Shell Co. (PR), Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re BSJ Tower AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
- In re Barry Yao Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1959
- In the Matter of Barry Yao Company, a Copartnership, and Barry Yao, an Individual, Bankrupts. Francis F. Quittner v. Bertram S. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Baez v. RoyceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024