Legal Opinion

Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. Partnership

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 23, 2007No. 1 CA-CV 06-0162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARKER, Judge.

¶ 1 M.E. Schepp Limited Partnership (“Schepp Partnership”) appeals from entry of partial summary judgment ordering statutory partition of residential property in which it owns an undivided interest as a tenant in common with Hal Owens. It contends the court erred by failing to find issues of fact concerning the existence and enforceability of an oral, voluntary partition agreement. For the reasons that follow, we agree and accordingly reverse.1

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 The parties to this lawsuit own undivided interests as tenants in common in Lots 17, 18 and 20,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Pearsall v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. AROK Construction Co. v. Indian Construction ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. PartnershipArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Best v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Snyder v. HSBC Bank, USA, N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  4. Owens v. M.E. Schepp Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API