Legal Opinion

A.M. v. Albertsons, LLC

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 2009No. A122307PublishedCited by 19 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

A jury found that employer Albertsons, LLC, 1 had violated employee A.M.’s rights under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA; Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.) and awarded her $200,000 in damages. (Gov. Code, 2 §§ 12900-12996.) Albertsons appeals, contending that (1) its motion for nonsuit should have been granted because there was no actionable failure to accommodate A.M.; (2) the trial court erred by refusing related proposed jury instructions; and (3) the trial court erred by instructing the jury that A.M. did not bear the burden of proof that she was unusually…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Carolyn Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wysinger v. AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SO. CALIF.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Bonnell v. Medical Bd. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
  2. Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Reese v. BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMSDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Gardner v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Atkins v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API