Legal Opinion

State v. Stamps

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1998No. Nos. C-970415, C-970416 and C-970417PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

In his sole assignment of error, defendant-appellant Walter E. Stamps asserts that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the charges against him. 1 Stamps claims that the state violated R.C. 2945.71, Ohio’s speedy-trial statute. We hold that Stamps was not tried too late, and affirm.

I. Time and Again

Stamps was arrested on December 31, 1995, and charged with driving under the influence and several minor infractions. The most serious of the charges, driving under the influence in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1), is a misdemeanor of the first degree. Under the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. SingerOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. KingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. ButcherOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. McBreenOhio Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. HohenbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. State v. KnottOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State v. RameyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API