Legal Opinion

State v. Singer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1977No. 76-788PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. BrowN, J.

The issue here is whether appellant is entitled to a discharge pursuant to E. C- 2945.73(B).

*105R. C. 2945.71(C)(2) and (D) provide that a person charged with a felony and held in jail on ■ the pending charge in lien of bail shall be brought to trial within 90 days after his arrest, unless such time limitation is extended by R. C. 2945.72. R. C. 2945.73(B) provides that upon motion at or prior to trial, an accused shall be discharged if not brought to trial within the required time period.1

Appellant was arrested and jailed on December 20, 1974, and was originally scheduled for trial on April 1,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. LeeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. PudlockOhio Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HomanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Cline v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 1991

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API