Legal Opinion

State v. Butcher

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1986No. 86-182PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Per curiam

Without citation to any legal authority whatsoever, the state maintains that when a criminal defendant is being held in jail as a result of having been charged with the commission of separate and distinct felonies, the triple-count provision of R.C. 2945.71(E) is not applicable. Presumably, the state seeks to invoke the rule contained in State v. Ladd (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 197 [10 O.O.3d 363], syllabus, and State v. MacDonald (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 66 [2 O.O.3d 219], paragraph one of the syllabus, that “R.C. 2945.71(D) is applicable only to those defendants held in jail in lieu of bail…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. LaddOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. CrossOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. GrayOhio Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. State v. WellsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. KistOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. StampsOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. State v. LoganOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. MastersOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API