Legal Opinion

Uber v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1967No. Civ. No. 7993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

Plaintiff sustained injuries in an automobile accident; in a previous action recovered judgment against the driver of an automobile involved in the accident; and by the instant action sought recovery on that judgment from the defendant insurance companies under policies of liability insurance respectively issued by them to three automobile sales agencies plaintiff claims were the owners of the automobile at the time of the accident. Each policy contained an omnibus clause insuring any person using an automobile owned by the named insured with the latter’s permission. Plaintiff brought this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dorsey v. BarbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Exchange Casualty & Surety Co. v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Abbott v. Interinsurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Uber v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. ChinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. DearingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Harbor Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API