Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. City of Belmont

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1958No. Civ. 17332PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the city, its councilmen and its city administrator, after sustaining a general demurrer to the second amended complaint, without leave to amend.

Plaintiff alleges he built a house in Belmont. Final inspection disclosed full compliance with the city’s electrical code, entitling plaintiff to be furnished with electrical service. All electrical wiring was approved by the electrical inspector. Defendants and each of them ‘ arbitrarily, wilfully, maliciously and unlawfully refused to cause or permit to be energized the electrical service for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Fernelius v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Payne v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Burns v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Miller v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API