Legal Opinion
Pieper v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 31, 1978No. Civ. 4-78-387PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DEVITT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Bradley Pieper, has brought this action to contest the seizure of certain records by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at the business offices of Bradley Exterminating Company. Plaintiff moves to have the records suppressed and returned to him, on grounds that they were seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Defendant, in turn, has moved to dismiss. Plaintiff’s motions are denied and defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.
In July of 1978 the EPA received information of a possible pesticide misuse by plaintiff in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Ninety-One Thousand Dollars in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
- Floyd v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- Ross v. MeeseDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- PALMIERI VS. CLARK CO.Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
- Palmieri v. Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 2015