Ross v. Meese
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRITT, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, Carolyn Ross, brought this civil action for injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to the first, fourth, fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution. She alleges that on 15 March 1985 approximately seventeen federal and state agents entered her home pursuant to an invalid search warrant and conducted an illegal search and seizure. She seeks the following relief:
I. A declaration that the search of plaintiffs home violated her fourth amendment rights;
2. An injunction requiring the destruction of all material obtained during the search;
3.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Mr. Lucky Messenger Service, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Harold Wellington Rapp, Harold Wellington Rapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Pieper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Donlon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ross v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Ross v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- R.J.F. Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987