Legal Opinion

State v. Memoli

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 10, 2011No. 2009-349PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. Defendant Richard D. Memoli appeals from a judgment of conviction based on a jury verdict of aggravated sexual assault. He contends the trial court erred in: (1) excluding evidence of complainant’s use of cocaine during the months preceding and following the assault because it precluded him from presenting his defense that complainant voluntarily exchanged sex for drugs; and (2) declining to instruct the jury on the prohibited act of lewdness as a lesser-included offense. We conclude that the *240court’s pretrial order excluding evidence of complainant’s drug use was error, and reverse and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Yagih AboumoussallemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  4. State v. PatnaudeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. State v. BerardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Billings v. Billings, Sr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. State v. BolaskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. BellKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. FAHAMSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. In re A.C.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API