Legal Opinion

Hollenkamp v. Peters

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1987No. C6-87-348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment entered pursuant to an agreement between appellants and respondents. Appellants argue the trial court improperly included terms in the judgment not agreed to by the parties, through incorporation of an attached memorandum. Additionally, appellants claim that in entering judgment the trial court erred by making findings of fact. The entered judgment was in the nature of a consent decree, based on an agreement between the parties. Consequently, appellants claim, because no adjudication on the merits had taken place, it was inappropriate for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Hafner v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Roseberg v. SteenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State Bank of New London v. Western Cas. & Sur. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Hollenkamp v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. AFSCME Council No. 14, Local Union No. 517 v. Washington County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API