Legal Opinion
Hollenkamp v. Peters
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 20, 1984No. C8-84-1311PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellants appeal the trial court’s order granting them a partial preliminary injunction. The trial court’s preliminary injunction restrained respondents, except Alois Nieders, from interfering with the functioning of the St. Pius V Priory. Appellants claim the trial court erred because it did not restrain respondents from holding themselves out as knights in the Sovereign Order of St. John of Jerusalem, Knights of Malta and from having “supreme authority” over that organization. We affirm.
FACTS
The Sovereign Order of St. John of Jerusalem, Knights of Malta (Order)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- AMF Pinspotters, Inc. v. Harkins Bowling, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Thompson v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Cramond v. AFL-CIOSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hollenkamp v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987