State ex rel. Bradway v. DeMattos
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, 5., entered September 16, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to compel the levy of a tax to pay certain indebtedness fund warrants, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
This is an action in mandamus to compel the defendants, as officers of the city of Bellingham, to levy a tax to pay certain indebtedness fund warrants issued against the city of Fairhaven. In his amended complaint filed May 1913, the plaintiff sets up four causes of action.
In the first, he alleges that Bellingham was formed by the consolidation of Whatcom and Fairhaven, in 1904; that he is the owner of eighteen warrants aggregating $4,681.18, issued by the city of Fairhaven to one Frye, each dated November %0, 1900, and bearing interest at the rate of six per cent per annum. Copies of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Harshman v. Knox CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ward v. JoslinSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- German-American Savings Bank v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. American Freehold-Land Mortgage Co. of London v. TannerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hutson v. Wenatchee Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Coolsaet v. City of VeblenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Connor v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Dandoy v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State ex rel. Hunter v. RonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.