Legal Opinion
Connor v. City of Haverhill
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 13, 1939PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The petitioners, taxable inhabitants of Haverhill, bring this petition under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 40, § 53, to restrain the city and its officers from paying to the respondents Morse and Goodwin' the sum of $6,000, being the amount of a judgment entered by agreement in an action by Morse and Goodwin against the city for architectural services alleged to have been rendered by them as partners in preparing plans for an addition to the “Fox School.”
The respondents Morse and Goodwin, appealing from a final decree in favor of the petitioners, contend that the judgment embodies a valid settlement or…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Union Bank of Richmond v. Commissioners of OxfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Kelley v. MilanSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wren v. Hynes' administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Flood v. HodgesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bell v. Treasurer of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Montgomery County v. REVERE NATIONAL CORP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- City of Quincy v. Brooks-Skinner, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Quinlan v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- James v. Mayor of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.