Legal Opinion

Schessler v. Keck

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1954No. Civ. 20057PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Defendants’ individual demurrers to the second cause of action in plaintiff’s first amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend. Their separate demurrers to the first cause of action were sustained with leave to amend within 20 days. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered after she failed to further amend within that time.

Plaintiff’s first cause of action alleges, so far as is here pertinent, that at all times referred to in the complaint she was an unmarried woman whose occupation, from 1946 until the present, was that “of cooking and catering in fine homes in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lorenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Okun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bradley v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API